Skip to content

Reconciliation in Sri Lanka: Harder than Ever

by The International Crisis Group


Two years since the defeat of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), Sri Lanka is further from reconciliation than ever. Triumphalist in its successful “war on terror”, the government of President Mahinda Rajapaksa has refused to acknowledge, let alone address, the Tamil minority’s legitimate grievances against the state.

The regime destroyed the Tigers by rejecting the more conciliatory approach of prior governments and adopting the insurgents’ brutality and intolerance of dissent. Now, contrary to the image it projects, the government has increasingly cut minorities and opponents out of decisions on their economic and political futures rather than work toward reconciliation.

As power and wealth is concentrated in the Rajapaksa family, the risks of renewed conflict are growing again. Partners, especially India, Japan, the U.S., UK, European Union (EU) and UN, should send a strong message against increasing authoritarianism, condition aid on transparency and restored civilian administration in north and east and support accountability, including an international inquiry into alleged atrocities by both sides in the war’s final stages.

Much has improved with the end of the war in May 2009. The paralysing threat of suicide attacks on civilians in the south has ended with the destruction of the LTTE, while Tamil families no longer fear the Tigers’ forced recruitment of their children and other abuses. Economic and political security is better for some segments of society. But decades of political violence and civil war have polarised Sri Lanka’s ethnic communities and undermined institutions, particularly those involved in law and order. Each of the major ethnic groups – Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims – has suffered immensely. Conflicts have not just left hundreds of thousands dead, injured or displaced but have also entrenched fears and misunderstandings in each community.

Progress toward reconciliation in this environment was always going to be difficult. It has been made much more so by the post-war policies of President Rajapaksa and his powerful brothers. With emergency and anti-terrorism laws still in place, they continue to violently repress the media and political opponents, while manipulating elections and silencing civil society. Constitutional reforms strong-armed through parliament have removed presidential term limits and solidified the president’s power over the attorney general, judiciary and various “independent” commissions. Northern areas once ruled by the LTTE are now dominated by the military, which has taken over civil administration and controls all aspects of daily life – undermining what little remains of local capacity. Democratic political activities in the north and east have been suppressed through the use of violent and corrupt ethnic Tamil proxies and other Rajapaksa loyalists. Development of those areas has been conducted without local consultation; indeed many Tamil residents feel that it is more like the extraction of the spoils of war than a real effort to improve livelihoods and build trust.

To deflect criticism of its unlawful conduct in the final stages of the war the government established a Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC). Promoted as a mechanism for both accountability and reconciliation, it will produce neither. In April 2011, a UN panel of experts found that the LLRC lacks the independence, mandate and witness protection capacity to serve as an accountability process for the many credible allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by both sides and recommended an international investigation. Correcting the LLRC’s flaws would require not only a new commission or other mechanism but also a reversal of the Rajapaksas’ core post-war policies. While the LLRC has served as a platform for airing some grievances, it has failed to win confidence domestically and can do little to aid reconciliation. Sri Lankans know better than anyone that such a commission is ultimately powerless.

Despite Sri Lanka’s long history of failed and ignored ad hoc inquiries, the international community seems willing to gamble on another. While India, the U.S. and UK have recently signalled greater scepticism of the government’s efforts, so far they and other supporters are repeating the mistake they made during the war. There was little real effort to prevent the atrocities at the end of the fighting, in part because the LTTE was so reviled but also because it was convenient to believe President Rajapaksa’s assurances that there would be political reform and conciliatory policies after a military victory. Now they risk falling again for the government’s delaying tactics and promises of accountability through the LLRC and political compromise through talks with Tamil political parties. So long as there continues to be no progress on either issue, large portions of the Tamil diaspora will remain convinced their community needs the protection that only a separate state can offer and will continue to ignore the LTTE’s share of responsibility for the atrocities at the end of the war and for the destruction of Tamil political society.

While the government tries to sell its “reconciliation” plans, the realities on the ground in the north and east are ominous. Many households are now headed by women, who are extremely vulnerable under military rule. Much of the aid promised has not arrived, and all is strictly controlled by the military. Over two thirds of the nearly 300,000 displaced civilians interned in the north at the end of the war have been sent home, but mostly to areas devoid of the most basic amenities. Another 180,000 of those and others displaced in prior stages of the war are still in camps or other temporary settings. Of the 12,000 or more alleged LTTE cadres detained at the end of the war, 3,000 are still undergoing “rehabilitation”. Hundreds more LTTE suspects, many detained for years without charge, are held separately. There is little transparency about the numbers or identities of post-war detainees, and upon release, many are closely monitored and harassed or pressured to act as informants. Families throughout the north and east are still searching for missing relatives.

Tamils are not the only community to find themselves marginalised. There have been no official efforts to address the conflicts that flared within Sinhalese communities in the south. Many disappearances have not been investigated; few families have been adequately compensated. No one has been held accountable. Similarly, Muslims expelled from the north or relatives of those murdered in the east by the LTTE have seen little in the way of resettlement, compensation or justice. Land disputes exacerbated by the conflicts affect all communities, but little has been done to design sustainable solutions. Concerns about corruption and increasing cost of living only add to the wounds of the past.

Reconciliation will slip further out of reach if the government maintains its policies. As part of broader efforts to counter false narratives put forth by it and by Tiger apologists alike and to restore the badly damaged rule of law, Sri Lanka’s partners should take immediate steps. Aid money should not be delivered without firm knowledge of how it will be spent, which requires extensive monitoring. Assertions that the government is moving towards reconciliation must be tested against realities on the ground, which means insisting on access. The Rajapaksas’ authoritarianism must be challenged directly and publicly, with strong messages against retrograde constitutional changes and centralisation of power. An international inquiry into alleged atrocities by both the government and LTTE is needed; UN member states should actively work to establish one, unless the government shows by the end of 2011 that it is willing and able to ensure accountability on its own. Sri Lanka eventually should also have an independent, inclusive truth commission to examine injustices suffered by all communities. It requires a fair accounting of its violent history to avoid repeating it.


To the Government of Sri Lanka:

1. Immediately revisit policies that are exacerbating minority grievances:

a) end the state of emergency and revise anti-terrorism legislation to comply with international law;

b) make available to family members the names and locations of all individuals detained for suspected involvement in the LTTE;

c) issue accurate death certificates or declarations of absence for those who were killed or went missing in the conflict, without compromising the rights of family members to seek further information or remedies;

d) allow public and open mourning of the deceased, including the establishment of memorials, and assist in the recovery of human remains;

e) permit all displaced persons and returnees full freedom of movement and assembly, expedite the opening of remaining restricted areas in the north and empower local officials and civil society actors to mediate land disputes in a transparent, credible process;

f) reduce restrictions on and improve access for humanitarian and civil society actors, allowing them to increase levels of assistance, including in areas such as psycho-social support and gender-based violence, and determine priorities with input from local communities;

g) return land, houses, vehicles and other property seized by the military and implement a single scheme for compensating victims of all ethnic groups with equal payments and a transparent process; and

h) remove the military from civilian activities, reduce its security role and take immediate action to end all harassment of and attacks on Tamil women by military personnel.

2. Deliver on promises to provider greater autonomy for the north and east:

a) expedite elections for the Northern Provincial Council;

b) decentralise decision-making on economic development, giving local government leaders control over resources and projects; and

c) commit publicly to the goal of reaching a political settlement on devolution in talks with the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), which should be followed by a process that includes independent representatives of Muslims in the north and east to finalise a settlement acceptable to all communities in those regions.

3. Create the conditions needed to pursue meaningful reconciliation among all ethnic communities:

a) acknowledge that the war with the LTTE was not only a war against a ruthless terrorist organisation but also part of a larger ethnic conflict driven by grievances and prejudices of all communities;

b) recognise that a broad, inclusive national reconciliation process, including a truth commission to examine the injustices suffered by all communities, will be needed to sustain peace;

c) end all attacks on and threats against journalists and civil society actors, and stop using state media resources to perpetuate false narratives of the past and present;

d) reverse the consolidation of power in the presidency and military, including by proposing legislation to repeal the Eighteenth Amendment to the constitution and restore constitutional limits on the president’s term in office and power over the attorney general and judiciary, as well as commissions on human rights, police, elections, corruption, finance and public service; and by removing from military control all oversight of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and decision-making on economic development;

e) break with Sri Lanka’s long history of impunity, including by making public the reports of all presidential commissions of inquiry into human rights abuses, especially those established by President Rajapaksa, and by implementing credible accountability processes for past and present abuses; and

f) request that the LLRC complete its report as soon as possible and release it to the public.

To Sri Lanka’s International Partners, including India, Japan, the U.S., UK, EU and UN:

4. Encourage the conditions needed for longer-term reconciliation and to reduce the risk of a return to violence:

a) endorse and urge swift implementation of the recommendations of the UN Secretary-General’s Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka (see Appendix B), including the establishment of a complementary international inquiry into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity (see Recommendations 5a and b);

b) evaluate all aid and engagement in light of the risks of a return to conflict and insist on the highest levels of transparency, external monitoring and non-discriminatory community participation in setting priorities;

c) highlight consistently the issues that affect all communities, including growing authoritarianism, militarisation, emergency laws, weak rule of law, impunity, corruption and repression of dissent;

d) review military-military ties and suspend assistance until there is a credible investigation of the alleged violations of international humanitarian and human rights law identified by the UN panel of experts; and

e) convene a high-level meeting of donors and other development partners, including the World Bank and Asian Development Bank, before the end of 2011 to agree upon and ratify with the government a strong set of principles for the delivery and monitoring of assistance; those principles should incorporate a) to d) above and emphasise the need for the government to commit its own funds to benefit its war-affected populations; in advance of the meeting, the government should be required to propose an assistance strategy and timeline for demilitarisation and return to civilian administration in the north and east.

To the UN and Member States:

5. Support processes to establish accurate accountings of past and present violations of international law:

a) work to establish an international inquiry – pursuant to any lawful authority including the Secretary-General’s or the UN Human Rights Council’s – into the credible allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity by both the LTTE and government forces, unless the government demonstrates convincingly by the end of 2011 that it is willing and able to hold accountable those responsible for alleged crimes;

b) ensure that the international inquiry is complementary to any credible domestic accountability mechanism that may emerge by, for example: focusing sequentially on certain incidents or categories of crimes and shifting to the next set of incidents or crimes only when the inquiry is complete or parallel domestic processes with respect to those incidents or crimes are proven to meet international standards; the international inquiry could start with alleged attacks on hospitals and humanitarian operations by government forces and child recruitment and suicide attacks by the LTTE;

c) use all available mechanisms – including the involvement of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Human Rights Council, the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances and UN special rapporteurs or representatives on extrajudicial executions, torture, violence against women, the protection of human rights while countering terrorism, the human rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs), and children and armed conflict – to press the government to end impunity, improve the situation for current and former IDPs and detainees and open up access for humanitarian and development actors;

d) follow through on commitments to review UN conduct during the war, as recommended by the panel of experts; but separately from any review immediately revisit the UN’s failed policy in Sri Lanka of holding back on public criticism to maintain humanitarian access; and

e) review Sri Lanka’s contributions to UN peacekeeping operations and refrain from accepting the participation of its troops until there is a credible investigation of the allegations against the military in the UN panel of experts report.

To Tamil Diaspora Groups:

6. Help create the conditions needed to pursue meaningful reconciliation among all ethnic communities:

a) renounce the LTTE’s brutality against Sinhalese, Muslims and Tamils and repression of dissent within the Tamil community;

b) acknowledge that the LTTE shares responsibility for the suffering and massive loss of Tamil life in the north in the final stages of the conflict; and

c) support and cooperate with the investigation and prosecution of alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity by the LTTE throughout the conflict.

Colombo/Brussels, 18 July 2011 [Full Report on International Crisis Group Website]


  1. lion says:

    The President is in the North in view of the LOCAL GOVT ELECTIONS..mind you he is heading the campaign… ……….AND IT IS TO WIN AT ANY COST………….. to prove that the Diaspora and the West is wrong in their assessment of his sincerity in addressing the grievances of the Tamil People…..and his leadership is accepted by the Tamil People.

    What Prabakaran did was used GUN & TERROR tactics to prove that all the Tamil people accepted what he did.

    The supposed to be democratically elected President of the Country has to resort to the same tactics in a different way….terror is carried out as usual by the Army…it began 2-3 months ago….and now he is ……..LIKE THE SANTA IN THE TOWN…….delivering goodies..and..goodies…he has become a friend of the Tamil people. WE HAVE SEEN HIS ELECTIONS CAMPAIGNS CONDUCTED IN THE SOUTH…..AND HOW CORRUPT THEY HAVE BEEN……


    The headlines of a pro Govt English Daily today was
    “ICC CANNOT TAKE ACTION AGAINST US,ISRAEL AND SRI LANKA…… say even if the Tamil people vote the Govt out still nothing can be done by the west ….therefore elect me…. and select what you want ….I will deliver……

  2. davidson says:

    Tha’s why countries like Sri Lanka, Israel and US don’t sign uo Rome Statute.

    States can be terrorist but similar states gang up at intergovernmental bodies and make them eneffective.

    International justice system has to evolve to serve justice to the oppressed.

  3. Leela says:

    In just one sentence of this write-up anyone can assemble the stance of the ICG: “The regime destroyed the Tigers by rejecting the more conciliatory approach of prior governments and adopting the insurgents’ brutality and intolerance of dissent.”

    In the first instant, ICG must tell us whether the said conciliatory approach by prior governments had persuaded LTTE to come to sense of negotiations or had it taken undue advantage of those gestures and strengthened its capacity to fight.

    We ought to remind ICG that each and every government that talked peace with LTTE had become mere gullible in the end. President Premadasa had been the first Sri Lankan leader to be deluded by Velu, the LTTE leader. Premadasa said; he is the elder brother and Velu the younger brother. Silly man was blasted to pieces by LTTE no sooner he was duped to give them arms and sent back the IPKF.

    But the most foolish had been the government of RanilW; he thought his government had an international safety net to track and tame the tigers. Never mind RanilW’s membership of the so-called powerful international Christian rulers’ clubs etc, he couldn’t even keep the tigers at the negotiation table in the end or stop their killings. It was during that period ex-foreign minister Kidiragamar was gunned down by LTTE.

    Westerners sort to define terrorists are of two types; good terrorists and bad terrorists. For them LTTE is a good terrorists. So, the woman named Adele who trained and necklaced cyanide capsules on human bombs like the one that killed Rajive Gandhi is allowed to live in London freely. But they clamour to arrest unnamed war criminals for unsubstantiated crimes.

    It’s a known fact that ICG is a tentacle of ruthless Western powers. Needless to say then, philosophy of ICG is synonymous with ‘good terrorist’ LTTE. ICG may crown the clown, RanilW for tolerating dissent of LTTE but it is clear majority people of this country think otherwise because they continue to trounce him at every election since.

    People in this country knew that Tamils have been promoting separation in Sri Lanka in subtle ways since 1928. They also knew that was before Independence and under the British Raj when Tamils held sway in everything. Hence they knew grievance couldn’t have been a reason for their demand for separation.

    They also knew, on May 14th 1976 the leaders of ITAK had put the cat out of the bag. And they submitted and passed a resolution that declared ‘war on Sri Lanka’ at a mass rally in Waddukkodai. And it asked Tamil youth to take up arms and urged them never to lay it down until ‘Tamil Eelam’ was won. And that is the war that continued till 18th May 2009 until President Rajapakse defeated it but ICG says, it was with ‘insurgents’ brutality’.

    People knew that those youth that were in attendance at the said rally and those that took reasoning of the leaders of ITAK seriously had become top rung terrorist leaders of LTTE later on. They knew there wasn’t much ideological difference or the goals of ITAK and LTTE but the road map to it (Tamil Eelam): LTTE wanted a straight run to Eelam where as ITAK wanted to achieve it through Federal.

    They knew, that rift and LTTE desire to get all the parliament members of ITAK under its wing prompted a LTTE pistol gang to kill ITAK leader Amirthalingam. They also knew a new party named TNA, a declared proxy of LTTE had swallowed the ITAK later on.

    Today, LTTE is no more but ‘rump LTTE’ continues to foster its ideology through TGTE, BTF, GTF etc etc. And, TNA is back on the old road map of its predecessor, ITAK. It aims at Eelam through Federal. And the so-called International community etc gives oxygen to both road maps through ICG etc. And, President Rajapakse and his voters know where they stand for they are no gullible.

  4. cyril says:

    Neelai, Kamalai,Champai Rekai
    Rata, Jatiya ha Agama Kelasai
    Evarai,Eavarai Api Okko Evarai

  5. nathen says:

    You are one of those people who would bring curtians to MR if he he brings devolution to the Tamils and you were one of those who prevented BC pact Chelva Duddly pact being implemented you are the problem so is the Tamils who only want seperation because they site people like you that we as two communities cannot live together.
    Any outsider reads your comments along with kalu Albert, Anonymous etall will know the divide is so broad there can be no recounciliation only a divorce


The comment may need to be approved by Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting; generally approved/posted if they are not abusive of the topic as well as the author and/or another commenter.