Are You Contradicting the fundamental basis of the whole Tamil struggle?

April 3rd, 2008

An Open Letter to Mr. Veerasingham Anandasangaree

By Kusal Perera

I chose to write this essay as an open letter addressing you, after reading the news item “Grave concern over STF pull out from East; TULF” in the online edition of the DM on 22nd March, that quotes you very much on that issue. As a prelude to this essay, let me go on record that I respect you as a Democrat who stands for a politically negotiated settlement of the ” North-East War” though I have my own reservations on how you approach it. Of course, you are now compelled to live with State security I presume, but I would not hold that against you as long as that armed security remains personal and not part of your politics.

[Veerasingham Anandasangaree]

Now we come to the concerns you raise over proposed PC elections in the East. Agreed, it would never be free and fair with Pillayan and his cadres roaming the area, weapons in hand and with tacit government approval. You would therefore agree, the Batticaloa district LG elections were never free and fair despite PAFFREL stamping it so, for reasons they should know. The total process from nominating candidates through election campaigns and then up to the day of voting, Batticaloa was never without armed coercion, was always living with threats on lives and punctured with abductions and killings. None could openly and publicly campaign against the TMVP, although PAFFREL claims TMVP candidates did not carry arms. Why should they ? They had their cadres for the dirty job. Therefore the TMVP was able to pose without arms on elections day, for PAFFREL to certify them as “good boys”. You would also agree to disagree with the type of democracy the President speaks of after Batti LG elections. If that is the democracy the President wants the North to have through these fake elections, let’s pray to God Mr. Sangaree, to please save them from tortured and traumatised life. Death for the North would be far more relieving.

That much and more you are aware of and that is more than good enough reason to register your concerns over PC elections as the DM quoted you saying [quote] “The withdrawal of the STF will do more harm than good. It is a well known fact that there are armed groups in the East creating a fear psychosis among the people. The government’s decision to withdraw the STF without disarming these armed paramilitary groups will definitely affect the conduct of a free and fair election,” [unquote] But let me tell you fair and square Mr. Sangaree, you were too much with the government prior to and during the Batti LG elections silently watching the government tie up with the TMVP, your argument though valid, most unfortunately, your voice wouldn’t be seriously heard. Now that the government had allowed the TMVP to be part of the local governing process while carrying arms, the TMVP and the government would argue they cannot be disarmed, for they need security to run the Urban Councils and Pradeshiya Sabhas as elected representatives of the people (sic). In the South, that would be a sound argument for the war cry to sustain this government.

Worst is your own dilemma and contradiction in meeting the challenge of armed electioneering in the East. TMVP is the “armed group(s)” you refrain from naming but say would ‘definitely affect the conduct of a free and fair election’. You are no doubt right on that even without names. Yet the reason(s) why the TMVP live with arms is no different to the reason(s) why those armed groups that you coalesce with, carry arms. The PLOTE and the EPRLF (Pathmanabha) have not laid down arms either, as you know quite well. They are very much ‘para military’ as the TMVP. Mr. Siddharthan being in parliament once before, does not
metamorphose his PLOTE into any democratic form. Your alliance with these two para military groups will not be any different to the PA –TMVP alliance.

How on earth can you “contest the polls on a common list” with the armed PLOTE and the EPRLF (Pathmanaba) “for the purpose of preventing the East from falling into the grip of an armed group”? Your presence with two armed groups would only have the people of East living through nightmares with bitterly opposed and competing armed groups wanting to silence each other during elections to win at any cost. Win to be heir to the Chief Minister’s post.

The issue of PC elections for the East, Mr. Sangaree, does not restrict itself to the issue of ‘how free and fair’ it would be, although like every one else you are also trying to hype that issue as the only major issue. It raises a more fundamental issue from the side of Tamil politics that you wish to ignore right now. Where do you stand on the de-merger of the two provinces ? The very argument of those who took recourse to legal action in asking for the “de-merger” of the North – East province was that there is no “Tamil homeland” in Sri Lanka. The de-merger was the call of certain parties in the government’s Sinhala extremism to which your friends in the government most willingly subscribed to. It was therefore a plain bifurcation of the “Tamil homeland” that all of you accepted as a cardinal principle at Thimpu.

To date, neither you nor other Tamil groups including EPDP have publicly dissociated yourselves from that joint “Thimpu Declaration” made in July 1985. The Tamil Delegation at Thimpu discussions consisted of representatives from the LTTE, EPRLF, TELO, EROS, PLOTE and your own TULF. The LTTE, EPRLF, TELO and EROS were also constituent members of the then ENLF. All of them together signed the Joint Declaration at the conclusion of Phase I of Thimpu discussions, which very clearly said [quote] “It is our considered view that any meaningful solution to the Tamil national question must be based on the following four cardinal principles” [unquote] and of the four, the last one being no more valid, the first three remain as [quote]

* recognition of the Tamils of Ceylon as a nation

* recognition of the existence of an identified homeland for the Tamils in Ceylon

* recognition of the right of self determination of the Tamil nation [unquote]

Most signatories (except the LTTE) to this “Joint Thimpu Declaration” including you as the TULF now accept elections to one half of your own “identified homeland” as the de-merged Eastern Province. Accepting PC elections to the East only means an acceptance of the argument put forward by the Sinhala extremism in de-merging. Can you therefore explain where you stand on these “cardinal principles” now ? Do you now disagree and reject the Joint Thimpu Declaration ? You have to answer that single question before deciding to contest PC elections for East.

The moment you accept PC elections to this bifurcated “Tamil homeland” you become a traitor to the Tamil Nation, who voted en-bloc for a “Separate Tamil State” in 1977 responding to your call for a separate State. Remember also, the argument of “a Tamil Nation” can not be defined and accepted without a historically claimed “homeland”. That was reason why Sinhala extremism wanted the North – East de-merged. Now at this point, your acceptance of this de-merged East with the PC elections, negates the “homeland” argument on which the Tamil people could claim nationhood. Thereafter Mr. Sangaree, there is no issue as recognition of the right of self determination of the Tamil nation. There is no reason for power sharing. And no argument as you had made previously for a federal system of governance to accommodate Tamil aspirations.

Again, you are not only accepting East as a separate political constituency, you are accepting the powers vested under the 13th Amendment too. Powers you were adamantly refusing to accept as far less than required for resolving long felt Tamil grievances. With all that you also subscribe now to the argument that Eastern Tamils have a different ethnic right and has to be liberated from the hegemony of Northern Tamils, as Karuna Amman argued after his break with the LTTE. In fact and in plain language, you are now contradicting the fundamental basis of the whole Tamil struggle in which I thought you represent that part which is democratic.

Where are you heading to now in the dust of your political career and in whose political caravan ? You are apparently travelling in a government bus that has a very conspicuous sticker in Sinhala that says “This is Gauthama Buddha’s Land”. Your little faint note asking for Tamil rights therefore go unheeded and without credibility. And, I am sorry about that.

Entry Filed under: transCurrents Commentary

10 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Dingiri  |  April 4th, 2008 at 6:09 am

    The TMVP openly carrying arms does not necessarily undermine the validity of the elections in the East as long as they dont enter the polling booths and intimidate voters. Men carrying arms has been a feature of life in the East for 20 years and is not likely to change overnight. We need to understand that the North and East are not going to return to normalcy immediately whether it is under the SLG or the LTTE. Peace and Democracy will have to evolve gradually as people grow more secure and more confident to stand up to armed “enforcers”.

    The Government needs to use whatever influence it has with the TMVP to point out to them that for the TMVP’s own political survival they need to evolve into a Political force that works for the people’s betterment rather than fighting endless turf wars with their rivals.

    In fact the best thing the government can do is to devide the country up proportionately between Northern Tamil, Eastern Tamil, Moslem and Sinhalese states and cut them adrift completely to manage their own affairs. Only then will the governing bodies of these states be held accountable by their peoples. With accountability will come responsiblility and eventually decent government. The Sinhalese state will benefit too. Currently its all too easy for governments to blame the war for all their shorcommings.

  • 2. Dingiri  |  April 4th, 2008 at 6:15 am

    Why not have a vote in the East to find out if they want to join the North and merge the two if the outcome is a “Yes”? Surely anything short of that would be undemocratic? Why shouldnt there be self determination for everybody?

  • 3. aratai  |  April 4th, 2008 at 6:46 am

    Now, you have given Mr.Sangaree an other chance write one more letter to a newspaper.

  • 4. R.S.Ganeshan  |  April 4th, 2008 at 7:15 am

    Kaushal Perera has done well to expose people like Sangaree.

    What else can be expected from a person like Sangaree who defected from the LSSP in the 1970’s and went on to the Tamil Congress along with Motilal Nehru who defected from the CP. Sangaree after jettisoning from the Tamil Congress then became an MP under the TULF label and firted with JR for sometime, to have Kilinochchi designated as separate from the the NP. Now again he is in the process of shedding his skin.

    He is used to the comforts of power and influence and will always ensure how to survive as long as it takes just to make his presence felt with one or two monthly press releases, TV and radio interviews to keep himself dying of boredom and to ensure that MR and his cohorts are pleased, that’s all he can do.

  • 5. Eelavan  |  April 4th, 2008 at 8:21 am

    Does anyone from Sri Lanka care about this Tamil politician?

  • 6. Suresh M  |  April 4th, 2008 at 10:06 am

    Thank you Kusal Perera!.

    You said it very well.

    A.Sangaree does not represent any section of Tamils. He is a lone TULF member cum leader, who goes around the world and misrepresent Tamils. Fortunately, except our neighbor, no one pays attention to his nonsense.

  • 7. vije  |  April 4th, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    Comment # 2
    You are right. At the same time, why not respect the vote of the Tamils for a separation.
    They voted the TULF at one time with this mandate. Even now with the foreign observers, you could conduct an election on this issue even in Vanni without intimidation of the LTTE, provided the Government is willing to do so and respect the outcome.

  • 8. 2ndClassTamil  |  April 4th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    A thorough demolition of Mr Anandasangaree’s position. Though he was a (very much unnoticed)teacher from my old school, I thoroughly disapprove of his politics. Left to the Tamils, he will be totally shunned. He is simply being propped up by the Sinhala govts and media to serve their ends. A lightweight politician like him will have big trouble answering Kusal’s challenge!

    What we are witnessing is the rape of the Tamil homeland by bifurcation, with bribed Tamil onlookers. Karuna/Pillaiyan & Co and the other Tamil groups shall answer history for their shortsightedness driven by short terms gains if not self-serving approaches.

    No political party contesting the election has so far made the merger an issue. TMVP obviously cannot while it is aligned with the govt. That is the fate of the other Tamil parties too, some of who were at Thimpu. They surely fear repercussions if they take that stance. [A good soul like dingiri #2 should know that de-merger is what the govt is pursuing. It will be the last to hold a referendum for fear of loosing. That is why none of the Tamil parties (who are puppets depending on the govt for their existence) don’t raise that issue].

    On the ‘free and fair’ elections… Fair? Yes, if there is no violence. Free? Definitely not, with the terror stranglehold on a traumatised population, coerced to yield the predetermined outcome. Otherwise the merger would be the central issue of the election!

    Does anyone know any party’s political manifesto? Why are they quiet? What are the people supposed to voting on? Is who the CM will be, the main issue? Laughable indeed! Politically, who is Pillaiyan? According to the BBC, a political party of the LTTE, the PFLT, is contesting. Is the cat amongst the pigeons? Let us wait a few more days to see how things will unravel.

    As far as I can see this election is to establish the govt’s writ in the de-merged east using the TMVP. Thereafter what awaits the TMVP is anybody’s guess and for sure will not be left entirely in their hands. An election in the east where the merger is not even an issue is a farcical election. Fair & free? My foot! Shame on the east!

  • 9. R.goonetilake  |  April 4th, 2008 at 7:10 pm

    Kusal Perera has hit the nail right on the foreheads of Douglas Devananda, Anandasangaree, Pathmanabha Faction, Plote Sitharthan etc,etc except for TMVP which is not a signatory to the Thimpu Principles.
    PA-TMVP-JVP-JHU coalition is right on the mark for not acceptiong the ‘Tamil Homeland Concept’.
    Will Anandasangaree, come out with his explanations, for him being branded as the elder statesman of Tamils by all who oppose LTTE?
    We all know that Douglas Devananda got no backbone or for that matter integrity to come forward with his clear explanation on questions asked by Kusal Perera.
    These are the laughing stock of Tamil Politics, and hence don’t wait upon for Anadasangaree to reply via an open letter to Kusal Perera.
    Anandasangaree is exposed of his current preidcament to sing along to the tune of his masters or else to starve in the wilderness.
    Those Indian Wallas who bet on these ‘out of date’ politicians to entrench their way of a solution to ‘Tamil Nation Question’ are wasting time and money.
    LTTE will win one day. The writings are on the wall already in Wanni and Mannar.

  • 10. V Siva  |  April 5th, 2008 at 10:16 am

    Anandasangaree and Gouglas Devanada are puppets of the Rajapakse regime at the expense of innocent Tamils.

    Shame on Ananadasangaree and Douglas that when the GOSL is committing war crimes against Tamils, you have said nothing but contnue to support the GOSL for petty benefits and selffish purposes.

    History tells that these evil and disgraceful people will pay the price for their part in wrong doing.

Leave a Comment

hidden

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

August 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Links

FederalIdea.com