PICTORIAL

transCurrents Home

The New Moral Majority - Black, it ain't!

by Vasee Nesiah

An African American is in the White House and this time he ain't going to be shining no shoes. No, sir!

Whilst it is understandable that most African Americans and others of a certain vintage would see the election as a 'win' in the battle for emancipation, the election of Barrack Hussein Obama has signaled a far more significant development in America's psyche. The World has witnessed a quantum leap in how Americans perceive themselves and Obama has laid bare the presumptions of a White and Black America, a Democratic and Republican America, a Religious and Secular America, etc., etc. Not just in his campaign rhetoric, but also in his vote tally on Election Day.

Despite the media hype about hordes of African Americans lining up to register to vote, it is notable that the African American share of the total votes cast had only gone up by 1% over the previous elections that put Bush in office for a second term. Similarly, the visions of rampant youth voters was also laid bare when that number only increased by 2% over the previous presidential election. In their first interview after the election, President-elect Obama's campaign team confirmed that their campaign over the last 21 months was not built around their candidate's age or race. Barrack Obama won because he won over the new moral majority.

The majority of the people who voted for Barrack Obama did so because his message resonated with their values. His steady demeanor underscored his consistent message and he carried the electorate with him. Neither his skin colour, nor his shocking middle name, proved to be a distraction to the 66 million voters who placed their trust in him.

Barrack Hussein Obama out performed the previous Democratic contender in almost every demographic, among voters of all genders, races, education levels, and income classes, and virtually all religions. Obama only underperformed John Kerry amongst older (65+) voters, and gay and lesbian voters. Not since Jimmy Carter have so many evangelical Christians voted for a democratic president and yet in California, that liberal bastion, they voted to ban Gay Marriage. No Democratic primary contest has been as divisive or as fiercely contested and yet Obama won over 80 per cent of Hillary’s 18 million voters. This election has shown that the American electoral landscape is rife with such conundrums.

It’s not just The Economy, Stupid!

America is fighting two wars, has an eEconomy in tatters and desperately needs a leader to make America feel good again. On the face of it, John McCain seemed the ideal candidate with his impeccable foreign policy and defense credentials, Republican badge of fiscal conservatism balanced by an image of being more centrist than any other Republican contender. McCain was the only Republican who could win Democrats over to his side and the election must have seemed within grasp with the endorsement of Lieberman, a recent vice-presidential nominee of the Democrats. Conventional wisdom would suggest that John McCain was a safe pick, but conventional wisdom is often the domain of those whose memories outweigh their ability to think ahead. Or as Obama defined, it, HOPE!

Obama and his team, weren't about to follow in Jesse Jackson's footsteps. To assemble a Jacksonesque rainbow coalition would only do to the Democratic ticket what Palin eventually did to the Republican ticket. Energise the base and then what? Instead, Obama and his team decided that American voters were truly more mature and rational than they'd been given credit for by the media and most politicians. Obama worked hard to stay on the high road, first with Hillary and then with McCain. He refused to be drawn into personality clashes, instead he hammered home the basic tenets of his platform with monotonous rigour.

This election wasn't about equality for people of colour, or the economy, or stem cell research or the war in Iraq. This election was about electing a leader who had the attributes of a leader - somebody who could steady the ship in a storm and lead it to calmer waters. The country responded to Obama's presentation of himself as somebody with a vision of where the country needs to go and how it could get there. The medium, Obama, was the message.

Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, None but ourselves can free our minds - Bob Marley.
The real impact of Obama's election will not have dawned on most African Americans, yet. This is not the dawn of Black Power, nor is it a sign that racism is dead. On the contrary, everyday reality is not going to change for most African Americans. Obama's election has cruelly robbed the black man of the right to feel sorry for himself. No longer can society take the blame for violence, drugs, teen pregnancies and dead-beat dads. The Obama era will inspire a new generation of African Americans to emancipate themselves from mental slavery and join the new Moral Majority. Those who choose to remain a bitter minority will wake up to the rude shock that their crutch is gone. The white man's conspiracy to subjugate the black man is no more - 'The man' is dead.

"We were very happy to welcome hundreds of Sri Lankan friends who joined us at the Hilton Hotel to watch the election returns. Our own straw poll showed exceptionally strong support for Obama among Sri Lankans. His election has struck a similar chord around the world" - Ambassador Robert Blake in the US Embassy Blog, Colombo

Moral Majority? Us too!

Almost everybody in every country must know somebody who cried whilst watching Obama's acceptance speech. What is it about Obama's election that would make a white woman cry in Melbourne or an old Indian cry in Singapore? What heart strings does a German in Hamburg share with a Brazilian in Rio? The answer, perhaps, is in America's brand promise and what it means to the rest of the World. Obama's Berlin speech drew unprecedented crowds and that was no accident. They didn't come for the rock music in the park atmosphere - they came to HOPE. The World has long swallowed sugar coated American ideals, only to find it a bitter pill. The eight years of Bush and the opportunistic politics of terrorism had sapped most of the World of the desire to celebrate life and just as the economic shutters threatened to plunge us into darkness, America presented us a bright new shining star.

We may not have been able to vote for Obama but we could certainly share in the hope that he infused in Americans. He spoke intelligently, not condescendingly. He came from a terrible disjointed and broken family and yet he was a model family man. Obama and his team realised that America's might was not in the dollar or the bullet but in the brand promise of the American constitution. Obama had ideals that we can all relate to - in sharp contrast to George Bush, and even Bill Clinton. It’s no wonder we cried tears of joy. No longer do we have to tacitly acknowledge or secretly admire tyrants around the globe, just for the fact that they stood up to a bigger tyrant in George Bush.

If Obama stays 'on message' as he has done for the last 21 months, then surely these must be the last days of Mugabe and his like in our miserable corners of the Globe? Or is that too much to HOPE?

5 Comments

Are you telling us that hybridity is now the new game in town! and we should all become cosmopolitan like you?

Posted by: bologama mansilva | November 13, 2008 09:57 PM

Vasee,

While I appreciate your opinion in your blog you couldn't be more wrong and naive about the US Presidential election. I find it quite fascinating how people around the globe, yourself included, have taken the Obama victory and utilized to support your point of view and/or cause(s).

The election was ALL about the economy!

The exit polls stated that 80% of the voters felt that Obama could do more for them economically than McCain. Bottomline, in bad economic times, people vote for their wallet. They put aside their other fears (security, personal ideals- abortion, gun rights, etc) for the HOPE of more $ in their pocket! The people felt that Obama's socialists policies- welfare checks for those that don't pay income taxes, cheap nationalized health care, etc- would benefit them more than McCain could. When the ecomony is hurting people like for the govt to give them handouts. This is human nature. I'm sure with inflation sky high in SL that people desire cheaper pertrol, rice, milk, etc thru govt subsidies and controls, no?

For additional credence that it was the economy you have to look no further than Sept 15th. At that point in time, McCain lead Obama in all the polls. It was this day that the grave economic news first hit the TV and newspapers. The financial and housing crisis, the massive stock market decline, etc. McCain could not recover.

In addition, how can you claim a new moral majority when Obama only received 52% of the vote??? This is not a mandate. 56 million DID NOT vote for him! Obama received just over 1.5 million more votes than Bush did in 2004.

It sure appears you have been caught up in the HOPE hype. Obama can give a good speech no doubt. However, given the security issues around the world, the US will need more than rhetoric that pleases the ears. We've already seen Putin, Hugo, Hamas, Iran and the rest of the rogue crowd begin to test our learn-on-the-job newly elected Obama.

I hope I'm wrong- but the tyrant (your silly word) Bush may soon be missed by the FREEDOM LOVERS around the globe. In the US, we live in a democracy (thankfully!) and 52% voted for Obama. Time for new leadership was the vote results but we get what we deserve. Time will only tell...

Posted by: Give me liberty or give me death!!! | November 14, 2008 11:17 AM

Thank you, Give me Liberty, for stating the true facts instead of this mythical hysteria. Vasee sounds like she could work for MSNBC. Now all the media types are going around asking, "What to we know about Obama? What is he going to do?" Of course they didn't think to ask that while they were crawling up his rear trying to get him elected. The answer is we don't know what he will do, and we know nothing about him. Why? Because after spouting marxism for a lifetime, he spent the past two years crafting himself as a mainstream American where he needed to be, or an oppressed black man if the venue required that. And of course, Mr. world citizen when that is needed. No one knows who the real Obama is, though my guess is the marxist will come out in full bloom in January. Hopefully he will grow to realize that the President of the US furthers US interests, not those of the rest of the world. But then irrelevant correspondents with their heads in the clouds will call him a "tyrant" and hurt his feelings. So much for HOPE.

Posted by: US son of SL parents | November 14, 2008 02:08 PM

Dear FREEDOM LOVER,

With due respect to the Prophet Moses, I disagree that we get what we deserve. By that token, you could argue that you deserve the economy in shambles and two demoralising wars. At the risk of being accused of being "naive" again, I'd like to think that in a democratic process, we usually get what we want.

That said, the point I was trying to make was that we have new filters to apply to ourselves and those around -- it took the election of Obama to wake us to the fact that the vaules we share are much stronger bonds than the traditional markers of race, creed, caste, etc.

I agree with you that "time will tell" if this new moral majority will flourish but IMHO its a welcome alternative to the old Moral Majority of Jerry Fallwell.

Posted by: Vasee Nesiah | November 14, 2008 04:50 PM

Hi Vasee Nesiah,

Americans wanted change, no doubt. So the Democratic party had an automatic lock on this election despite what the polls were saying earlier, and the people had only two viable choices, Hillary and Obama.

Electing Hillary would bring all the old Clinton baggage, and for minorities, especially African Americans, it would be a historic choice. It is not going to change the fact that a large portion of black youths end up in jails.

Obama was an atheist (so am I), who for the sake of politics embraced an African American version of Christianity and eventually had to disown his former pastor and promote himself as a mainstream Christian to get votes.

If you look at his first press conference as President-Elect, arrayed behind Obama were establishment democrats from the business world. Which means following the same policies that Hillary would have. So Obama simply gives a different face and excites the world, but he will govern just like Clinton. What is there to get so excited about it?

Posted by: Expatriate | November 14, 2008 11:05 PM

Post a comment

(The comment may need to be approved by transcurrents.com. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting; generally approved/posted if they are not abusive of the topic as well as the author and/or another commenter.)

(Please write the comment in paragraphs if its long and allow space between paragraphs, for easier reading by others)

Recent Posts on TC