Click for News Update: tweetsTrove

transCurrents Home

Defence Secy did not order me to fire on those coming holding white flags aloft-Maj. Gen. Shavendra Silva

The Nation speaks to Director, Military Operations Major General Shavendra Silva in the context of allegations being made that the ground troops during the last stages of the war executed LTTE leaders who approached them with white flags held aloft. Gen. Silva led the most successful 58 Division (former Task Force II) which recaptured from the LTTE, the most amount of territory, starting from Mannar Rice Bowl to Pooneryn and then across to Mullaitivu, the last holdout of the enemy

By Chamara Lakshan Kumara

Q: The allegation that the Sri Lanka Army shot dead a group of LTTE leaders who had come forward carrying white flags which was bandied about sometime ago has been raised again. We would like you, as a military officer who played an active role in the war on terrorism, to comment on this allegation.

A: I can speak only on behalf of the Division 58. I can categorically say that we never received a report saying that a group of white flag carrying LTTE leaders were gunned down by the troops. I saw newspaper reports carrying this allegation. I also read news reports which said that there was no truth in this allegation.

I feel sorry if an allegation of this nature has been made by a military officer. We carried out the tasks entrusted to us with commitment. In the circumstances, I can only say I deeply regret if such an allegation has been or is being made.

Q: Media reports also said that Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa had given you orders to shoot LTTE leaders if they come forward carrying white flags to surrender.

A: These reports are untrue. Beginning from the day on which the humanitarian operation was launched, Defence secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa kept repeating his instruction that we should avoid civilian casualties while carrying out the operations. We had this objective in view right throughout our operations. Therefore, I cannot imagine that the Defence Secretary would order shooting down anyone coming forward to surrender carrying a white flag. I can say with responsibility that I have never received instructions from him to shoot any civilian.

Q: However, this allegation reported to have been made is being repeated in the public domain. Foreign journalists as well as foreign diplomats appear to believe this allegation. Do you say there is no basis at all for this allegation?

A: I do not like to say anything in reply to what others say. I can speak from my personal knowledge. I cannot reply to what another person says.

Q: There are various conflicting stories in the public domain about what happened to LTTE Leader V. Prabhakaran during the last stages of the battle. What can you say about such stories, as a commander who played a decisive role in the war?

A: What all I have got to say is that Prabhakaran was killed in the war. He has died as deaths are inevitable in a war. He was killed the way the other cadres were killed.

Q: You were a news maker when the war on terrorism was on. Your name did not drop from the attention of media even after the war. Some sections of the media carried stories to say that you were responsible for creating the rift between General Fonseka and the government.

A: To my knowledge, no such thing has happened. I was just another officer in the Army. I had no need to create a rift between General Fonseka and the government. The websites may carry various things. But, I should categorically say that there was no need for me to create any crisis that could set General Fonseka and the government against each other.

Q: Who made the best use of your capabilities?

A: Every commander under whom I have worked have made use of my capabilities. I am an officer who carried out duties in the battlefield with commitment. It was Major General Wijaya Wimalaratne who first exploited my potential as a military officer when I was a 2nd Lieutenant, a Lieutenant and a Captain. In those days, at one Awards ceremony, I won three Weera Wickrama medals. Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa made the best use of my capabilities when I was a Captain. He made the best use of my capabilities during the operation launched to re-capture Jaffna Fort and in operations carried out in the East. I functioned as a GOC and a Brigade Commander when General Fonseka was the Army Commander. General Fonseka was well aware of my capabilities and entrusted me with tasks. I discharged all duties he had entrusted to me to the best of ability to justify the faith he had reposed in me.

Q: As I said earlier, you are a character much talked about by media personnel. Some say that Major General Silva is a ‘contractor’ of the government.

A: I have nothing to do with any contract. I am an Army officer who upholds discipline. I am carrying out duties pertaining to my position, my rank, strictly according to Army regulations. I am not much concerned about matters which come outside the parameters of my duties.

Q: There was speculation that you were planning to contest the upcoming Parliamentary elections from the Matale District. What is your interest in politics?

A: That is a baseless falsehood. I do not know who is responsible for spreading such rumours. I have no intention to contest the general elections. I have got several more years to serve in the Army. I hope to serve in the Army as long as I am happy in the Army. I am carrying out duties in the Army with great satisfaction. I cannot think of a life outside the Army at the moment.

Q: What is your target? To be the Army Commander?

A: No. I have no such target. As a Buddhist, I am resigned to what happens in life. I try to do my best as long as I wear my uniform. I want to serve to the best of ability the Army that has nurtured me. I am today what the Army has created. Therefore, I owe a debt of my gratitude to the Army. I am prepared to do my best for the Army to pay this debt.

Q: Some say that you are a character created and bloated by the media?

A: I maintain cordial relations with the media. Media played a very positive role during the war. The number of youth seeking to join the Army grew day by day when soldiers were becoming war casualties. The numerical strength of the Army contributed to the military victory. Journalists rendered a great service by reporting the developments in the war theatre.

I always expressed my appreciation to their services. Journalists continue to maintain a good rapport with me. Some people have misunderstood or misconstrued my relations with the media. I am comparatively a junior officer in the Army, but I have reached my present position thanks to my capabilities. My achievements may have caused some people pain of mind. I cannot help it. Besides, that is not something unusual.

Q: There is a raging controversy in the country over sharing of the credit for the war on terrorism. In your belief, who should deserve the lion share of the credit?

A: It is difficult to say so and so deserves the credit. The military victory is a victory of all the people in the country. COUETESY:THE NATION

5 Comments

Sarath Fonseka's low blow to this officer seems to have at least two ulterior motives.One to discredit this talented officer who is genuine Commander material and secondly to sacrifice these officers and save his ass in the event an UN investigation in to rights abuses materialize in the future.

The answers given by this Officer to some irrelevant and provocative questions indicates his class.Shavendra Silva. Kamal Gunaratna .Jagath Dias and several other brave officers are the front line leaders who risked their lives to defeat the LTTE while Fonseka was away on "other business" in his own words.

I am sure Fonseka being the vindictive and greedy person he is, knows that this Officer and a gentlemen will command the Army in the future.Fonseka's aim is to sling turds at him hoping that some will stick.

A significant positive outcome of the war against the LTTE is that several talented, patriotic and selfless officers took control of the Armed forces. This is more important to the safety of the Nation than anything else.Given the unholy alliances put together by communists capitalists and other extremists pose a major threat to the stability of the country going forward.Strong Armed Forces under the command of leaders like Shavendra are a must to safe guard the country against these opportunists.

Posted by: Praveen | December 21, 2009 03:45 AM

It is impossible to seperate the "wheat from the chaff" in this article. However it seems to be some form of damage control by an officer who has good contacts in the press.

We all know about the "I SPECIALISTS" in all walks of life. Those who market themselves with skill and aplomb and convince us

Posted by: Ravana | December 22, 2009 12:57 AM

Major General Shavendra Silva 's answer to the second question will make even an ordinary person to ponder whether to believe him based on the following :

1.Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa has given repeated instruction to General Silva. That means it could have been possible or even probable that the Defence Secretary may have by-passed Sarath Fonseka number of times and gave person to person direct instruction to General Silva on the latter's request .For expediency General Silva may have by-passed Sarath Fonseka and referred certain matters for DS to act direct by giving wrong information to DS

2. General Silva is saying "I can say with responsibility that I have never received instructions from him to shoot any civilian."
The question here is whehter both DS and General Silva considered surrendering non-combatants like Nadesanand others and their families, as civilians or not at that point? Because General Silva is even silent on surrendnering enemy combatants /prisioners of war.

Unless International Community and their organisations carry out proper invetigations truth will never be out.

Posted by: Anonymous | December 22, 2009 01:19 AM

Major General Shavendra Silva 's answer to the second question will make even an ordinary person to ponder whether to believe him based on the following :

1.Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa has given repeated instruction to General Silva. That means it could have been possible or even probable that the Defence Secretary may have by-passed Sarath Fonseka number of times and gave person to person direct instruction to General Silva on the latter's request .For expediency General Silva may have by-passed Sarath Fonseka and referred certain matters for DS to act direct by giving wrong information to DS

2.DS was an admirer of General Silva for a long time and had close relationship even during the last war

3. General Silva is saying "I can say with responsibility that I have never received instructions from him to shoot any civilian."
The question here is whehter both DS and General Silva considered surrendering non-combatants like Nadesanand others and their families, as civilians or not at that point? Because General Silva is even silent on surrendnering enemy combatants /prisioners of war.

Unless International Community and their organisations carry out proper invetigations truth will never be out.

Posted by: M.Thiru | December 22, 2009 01:23 AM

Why not claim that the killings were "mercy killings" Politics have no relation to morals. Popular agenda is to kill as many Tamils as possible,harass them to maximum, make you look like Dutu Gemunu aka Dushta Gamini. That is the vote catcher!

Posted by: Kingsley | December 22, 2009 09:39 AM

Post a comment

(The comment may need to be approved by transcurrents.com. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting; generally approved/posted if they are not abusive of the topic as well as the author and/or another commenter.)

(Please write the comment in paragraphs if its long and allow space between paragraphs, for easier reading by others)

Recent Posts on TC