Click for News Update: tweetsTrove

transCurrents Home

Govt. most vociferous on behalf of murderous leader Gaddafi is uncaring about campaigning on behalf of Tibetan ‘living Buddha’

by Upul Joseph Fernando

When Sri Lanka (SL) is gearing up to commemorate the Sri Sambuddha Jayanthi to mark the 2600th year following the enlightenment of Lord Buddha, the Tibetan spiritual leader Dalai Lama popularly recognized as the ‘ living Buddha’ has decided to go on retirement on the 10th of March 2011. Nevertheless , Jiang Yu , the spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, regarding Dalai Lama ‘s retirement had declared thus : ‘Dalai Lama has often talked about retirement in the past few years. I think these are his tricks to deceive the international community’

DLTC329.jpg

14th Dalai Lama

But close observers of the Tibetan scene point out that there is no suddenness in the Dalai Lama’s decision. “He has been speaking of the need to pass on the baton to a younger leader citing among other things his age.

Nevertheless, the timing of the ‘resignation’ is significant. It coincided with the anniversary of the ‘uprising’ in Tibet in 1959. Four days from today, Tibetan Parliament –in-exile would begin its 11th session.

The 75-year-old Nobel Peace Prize winner would like to see the ‘free election’ of his successor at the parliament session.

On its part, the Chinese government has been saying all along that it has to approve all reincarnations of living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism. China wants to sign off on the choosing of the next Dalai Lama.

In 1995, after the Dalai Lama named a boy in Tibet as the reincarnation of the previous Panchen Lama, Beijing put that boy under house arrest and installed another in his place.

Many Tibetans at home and exile have spurned the Chinese-appointed Panchen Lama as a fake.

But will that experience stop China from naming its own successor, to the 14th Dalai Lama?. If it does, it raises the possibility of there being two Dalai Lamas -- one recognized by China and the other chosen by exiles or with the blessing of the current Dalai Lama. The Tibetan Buddhism has a history of more than 1,000 years, and the reincarnation institutions of the Dalai Lama and Panchen Lama have been carried on for several hundred years.

But the ethnic Tibetan Leaders were a little more circumspect . The Chairman of the standing Committee of Tibet’s autonomous region’s people’s Congress commented that he could not deny that the Dalai Lama ,as living Buddha and religious leader did have some influence on his believers , and his death would have some minor impact on Tibet. The Chairman of the Tibet autonomous regional Government told the ‘China Daily’that the reincarnation of the Institutions of the Dalai Lama and Panchen Lama have been carried on for several hundred years ; these historical Institutions and religious rituals of Tibetan Buddhism must be respected , and it was not up to anyone to abolish the reincarnate Institutions. It must be said that both the ethnic Tibetan Leaders , though sworn to protect the party , and the Govt. allowed a glimpse into their inner thinking , they made it clear that while they were committed to perform their official duties , they do not condone insult of the Dalai Lama and do not contribute to the Chinese Government’s policy of appointing their own living Buddhas , especially the Dalai lamas and Panchen Lamas.

The question at issue is what stance SL as a Buddhist country going to take on this matter. SL is not only a Buddhist country but has also professedly championed the cause of Buddhism standing sentinel over the Buddhist tenets before the international community. When the Buddha statues were destroyed in Afghanistan , it was SL which raised a huge hue and cry against it for the whole world to hear. Moreover , when the Buddha statues and symbols were being treated derogatorily or insolently in European Hotels and Social clubs , it was SL which protested most vociferously to attract the attention of the world. The present SL Govt. went even as far as to refuse visa to the world famous super singing star Akon to perform in SL on the ground that he offended the religious susceptibilities of the SL Buddhists . The foreign media reported that , ‘the ban comes after protests over one of the Star’s music video featuring scantily clad women dancing in front of a statue of the Buddha’.

But curiously enough, the SL Govt. has however no motive to stand by Dalai Lama the well known ‘living Buddha’ of Tibet. Neither is the SL Govt. showing any interest pertaining to the ‘reincarnation’ of Lamas in Tibet. The SL Govt. which is most vociferous on behalf of the number one murderous leader, Gaddafi who is conducting aerial bomb raids on his people , is however uncaring about campaigning on behalf of Tibetan ‘living Buddha’. At least the SL Govt. can take steps to tell the Chinese Govt. to respect the Tibetan Buddhism and the ‘reincarnation’ of the Institutions. Sadly, the Govt. has not taken any measures in that direction.In SL’s struggle for independence, Tibet and its people had a close relationship. Ven. S. Mahinda Thero, a Tibet national was a prelate who went to jail on account of the SL’s independence struggle. It was Ven. Mahinda’s Buddhist ‘kavi’ (poem) titled ‘Freedom mantraya,’ written by him which provoked the national feelings and incited the Sinhalese to resist the British colonial rule domination of the Sinhalese in the country who were then treated like slaves.

Today, ironically ,Tibetan National Ven. Mahinda Thero who faced imprisonment because he contributed to SL’s struggle for independence is being commemorated by SL , while at the same time bartering away the Tibetan people’s freedom ,

Buddhism and true Buddhist spirits.

Courtesy: Daily Mirror

4 Comments

Yes it is very sad that a truly Buddhist loving country has gone this way. Worst is the fact that the principles of Buddhism is totally ignored, making it worse by the teachers - the monks, I am sorry to say this. It often makes me wonder why the teachers should be so involved and even enter politics.

The Tibetan leader, Dalai Lama, has to accept this, made worse by the SL govt's close association with the Chinese, a government which has destroyed the Buddhist culture of Tibet.

China could have easily made Tibet a territory under its control, like what they have done to Hong Kong. This worries some of us immensely.

Of course the same thing the SL govt. has done to the Tamils - the Chinese way.

Posted by: Canaga | March 30, 2011 03:53 AM

Neither has Thailand, Cambodia, Laos or any other country with a majority Buddhist population come out in the kind of defence and support of the Dalai Lama and Tibet

Come to mention it, nor has any of the Altrusitic West, who is so eager and happy to bomb the Middle East in the interest of Human Rights and Democracy

What's your point ?


Posted by: Anonymous | March 30, 2011 07:46 AM

When thousands of Tibetans were attacked by the Chinese forces, the US administration or the French Sarcozy did not threaten to send war planes?
So, this article should be sent to the so-called anti-Gaddafi alliance of the west. I think the author knows why these govt (and even the SL govt.) have not said anything against the chinese.

The SL govt policy is at least consistent. It does not want foreign governments intruding in the internal affairs, be it those of China, Gadaffi or Tibet. The inconsistency is with the Western powers.

Posted by: Gunasena | March 30, 2011 02:05 PM

you know nothing about Buddha or Buddhism.

Did you not write numerous pamphlets to back RanilW at the 2005 Presidential elections? But they were like hosanna that consists all but truth.

If you think writing a bit about the plight of Dalai Lama, and reminiscing nationalistic eulogies by our Tibetan born S.Mahinda thero could instigate us, the Sinhala Buddhists to rebel against President Rajapakse or yell against Chin, then you are sadly mistaken.

Kaddafi doesn’t bomb Libyan cities. Like Rajapakse killed LTTE, Kaddafi kills terrorists. It’s a fact that so-called rebels are terrorists named AQIM (Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb). So, it is Anglo-French-American oligarchy that is bombing Libyan people to help those that shout "Allahu Akhbar". The same way the US had armed Osama bin Laden to fight the Russians, they are now arming Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi , the leader of AQIM to fight Kaddafi. Anglo-French-American consortium don’t care; they want another Iraq, they think that is the way to get to its oil.

How could Kaddafi be a murderous leader when it is George Bush Jr that killed more than one million people in Iraq by his illegal war to find nonexistent WMDs.

42 years back, when Kaddafi ceased power, Libya was the poorest country in the world. But today, Libyans enjoy the best standard of living and have the best human development indicators in the African continent. Compared to that how Anglo-French-American consortium is doing in Iraq and Afghanistan after been occupied them for more than a decade?
Leela

Posted by: Leela | March 31, 2011 08:00 AM

Post a comment

(The comment may need to be approved by transcurrents.com. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting; generally approved/posted if they are not abusive of the topic as well as the author and/or another commenter.)

(Please write the comment in paragraphs if its long and allow space between paragraphs, for easier reading by others)

Recent Posts on TC