Click for News Update: tweetsTrove

transCurrents Home

Why did the the Rajapaksas lie to the people of Sri Lanka?

By Tisaranee Gunasekara

The state has a right under international law to ensure its national security and to defend itself against armed attacks…. Those ends do not however justify all means to achieve them; all actions for those legitimate purposes must comply with the requirements of international law…”— The Darusman Report

Ne plus ultra (Not further beyond): the inscription believed to have been carved on the Pillars of Heracles (Straits of Gibraltar), warning seafarers against venturing any further. In politics there is a ‘Ne plus ultra’ line which cannot be crossed with impunity.

The LTTE, by attacking civilians, conscripting children and murdering political-opponents, ventured far beyond this line, time and again. The revulsion caused by these excesses caused an international backlash; according to the Darusman Report, “By 2006, 32 countries had listed the LTTE as a terrorist organisation…. LTTE fundraising and arms procurement abilities were severely constrained thereafter.”

Remarkably, of these 32 countries, many were Western nations home to large Lankan-Tamil communities. Though sympathetic to the Tamil cause, most either helped Colombo or remained neutral, as the Tiger sank under the deadweight of its colossal crimes and errors. As the Report points out, “Many Sri Lankans and others round the world were relieved that the….LTTE renowned for its brutality was defeated……. However many people in Sri Lanka and elsewhere were deeply disturbed about the means used to achieve the victory…”

That is the crux of the matter: the Lankan regime is being faulted in the Darusman Report not for battling and defeating the LTTE, but for being blasé about the safety and wellbeing of civilian Tamils during and after the war. Contrary to the regime’s assertions, the Report accepts Sri Lanka’s right to defend herself militarily: “International law….respects the legitimate interests of a state like Sri Lanka facing a threat like the LTTE.” Thus the Report is not anti-war. It critiques the regime for causing avoidable civilian casualties; for example, it alleges that the UN hub in the No-Fire-Zone was shelled on January 24, 2009: “The United Nations security officer, a highly experienced military officer….discerned that the shelling was coming from the south, from SLA positions…. When United Nations staff emerged from the bunker…. mangled bodies and body parts were strewn all around them, including those of women and children. Remains of babies had been blasted upwards into the trees…. Although LTTE cadres were present in the NFZ, there was no LTTE presence inside the United Nations hub….”

The Report also alleges that the Army shelled civilian groupings even where UAV identification was possible: “On 8th April 2009, a large group of women and children, who were queued up at a milk powder distribution line…..were shelled…… Some of the dead mothers still clutched cards which entitled them to milk powder for their children.”

The Report severely critiques the regime for treating civilian Tamils with brutal insensitivity, post-war. For instance, it argues that “by keeping Menik Farm and other farms closed, and failing to release the IDPs, it did not allow the IDPs to seek shelter with relatives.” Since the camps lacked even basic facilities, this closed-door policy caused avoidable sufferings and preventable deaths. The Report also faults the Lankan regime for its failure to offer Tamils a New Deal: “Nearly two years after the end of fighting the root causes of the ethno-nationalist conflict between the Sinhalese and Tamil populations of Sri Lanka remain largely unaddressed and human rights violations continue”. (In fact, the regime is planning to turn the 13th Amendment into a dead-letter by transferring the powers of elected provincial councils into non-elected Jana Sabhas controlled by Presidential-sibling Basil Rajapaksa).

The regime accuses the Darusman Report of creating national-disunity. Sadly it is the Rajapaksas who wantonly wasted an ideal opportunity to create a genuine Sri Lankan identity, post-war. In its death throes, the Tiger abandoned all pretexts, and demonstrated that it did not care an iota for Tamils. For instance, according to the Darusman Report, “…in mid-April, LTTE cadres….forcibly recruited hundreds of young people from Valayanmadam Church….. Parents begged and cried for them not to be taken away to fight and to an almost certain death, but to no avail.”

The psychological conditions for weaning Tamils away from the LTTE/Eelam and winning them for a Lankan future were thus very much present, post-war. This potential could have been realised had the Rajapaksas not depicted and treated all civilian Tamils as actual/potential Tigers, had they appealed to impulses of kindness and generosity in the South rather than encouraging triumphalism and cultivating a fear-psychosis. Post-war, the Rajapaksas opted not for mercy and reconciliation, but for collective punishments and revengeful justice. This choice, rather than the Darusman Report, is responsible for Sri Lanka’s current condition as a psychologically-divided country.

When the UN Secretary General appointed his Advisory Panel, the regime enacted a tragicomedy and declared that it will neither recognise the Panel nor deal with it. And yet, as the Darusman Report reveals, the regime, while thundering insults at the Panel publicly, did engage with it secretly, behind the back of the nation: “The Government of Sri Lanka provided an explanation of the philosophy that frames its approach to accountability both in written responses to questions from the Panel and in a meeting on 22 February 2011 in New York….”

Why did the Rajapaksas lie to the people? Was it because they wanted to persuade the Panel not to come up with an adversarial report while using the Panel’s existence to ignite patriotic-hysteria locally? Mahinda Rajapaksa’s outburst of juvenile-euphoria about being voted No. 4 on the Time magazine’s list of influential persons demonstrates, yet again, that underneath his anti-Western bluster our President yearns to shine, not in Beijing and Tehran, but in Washington and London. Was this why the regime secretly cultivated a moderate image in New York while maintaining an anti-UN and anti-West façade in Colombo?

Having painted itself into a corner, Colombo is hoping that Delhi will come to its rescue. To achieve this purpose the Rajapaksas will make economic concessions to India and promise political concessions to Tamils. Will Delhi fall for it, again, ignoring the welter of emotions in Chennai on this issue? Can Delhi afford international intervention on its doorstep, given the Kashmiri factor?

On May 1st, the Rajapaksas are expected to launch their anti-UN Pada/Rath Yathra. According to the regime, it is the patriotic duty of all Lankans to dismiss the Report in toto. Anyone who thinks the Report should be read and analysed, let alone investigated by an independent body, is thus deemed an anti-patriot.

The Tiger creed demanded that Tamils cultivate an unconditional and unquestioning faith in the Leader, if they did not want to be castigated as traitors. As the Darusman Report pointed out “Vellupillai Pirapaharan demanded absolute loyalty and sacrifice and cultivated a cult-like following. Internal dissent was not tolerated….” This meant maintaining a ‘patriotic’ silence, as the Tiger went from excess to execrable excess. That path of total-submission to the Leader’ ended not in Eelam but in utter and total defeat. If we give the Rajapaksas a carte blanche in the name of patriotism, an equally unpalatable end will await us, someday.

8 Comments

.
The island is run by an american citizen 'Gota'.

As per the Sinhalese Media, US violated human rights in Iraq, Afgan, Vietnam....

So, Gota must be arrested and investigated by Srilankan authorities for US's violations.

:-)

Posted by: aratai | April 30, 2011 06:50 PM

As a born Sri Lankan and currently and as a US citizen may I fly a simple question to all world bodies. What were you all were doing for thirty years when ruthless terrorist were killing all ethnic groups and why they did not take human rights violations, war crimes against LTTE or the leaders Prabakaran, Anton Balasingham and so forth. How can they summarize all this thirty years to last three weeks of the liberation war which crushed this worst terror organization.

Posted by: Malraj De Silva | April 30, 2011 08:45 PM

Dear Asaranee,
You are a staunch UNP supporter and Premadasa supporter who never bothered about the killings of Premadasa who killed many intelectuals and 50,000 youth of this country.During LTTE hey day you never bother to talk about their atrocities or during Premadasa time you never bothered to do either.Now Rajapakshas eliminated LTTE for once and forever and you are very sad about it.People will never believe you.So find some other job!You are so biased against the SL govt as you are a UNP supporter.

Posted by: Ashok | April 30, 2011 08:48 PM

Tisaranee Gunasekara

Wonderful analysis !!

Well written article !!


--------------------

Rajapaksa Government is trying to deceive the International Community and Sri Lankans too.

Rajapaksa so-called “reconciliation” efforts is another hoodwinking manipulation of the gullible

Sri Lanka ruling party claims that accountability will harm “reconciliation”

However, reconciliation Rajapaksa style is a complete misnomer.

The comic nature of an Orwellian state is embodied in Sri Lanka today.

Tamils are press ganged by the police into signing a petition against a UN investigation.

Tamil children are being forced to sing the national anthem in Sinhalese.

Sri Lanka expands its military in times of peace, as its army holds an iron grip of terror over Tamil areas.

Stories of land and house being appropriated and handed out to Sinhala citizens are rife, but of course foreign journalists are prevented from going to those parts of Sri Lanka.

Tamil citizens continue after the war to ‘disappear’ and mangled tortured bodies continue to surface.

Foreign projects to help the war battered Tamil community are effectively stifled by the Sri Lankan state.

And Sri Lanka media continues its self-censorship with little reporting of the persecution of the Tamil population.

And the state sends former generals to foreign capitals to sell its ‘successful war on terror’ which massacred over 40,000 Tamil civilians.

It would be unbelievable fiction, if it tragically wasn’t happening to real people.

To dislike, Tamils or Sinhalese is to be racist, but to dislike Sri Lanka Government is to stand against a value system that is no different to acting against a Nazi Germany, Hutu Rwanda or any other fascist state


Posted by: Naavalan | April 30, 2011 10:48 PM

You have missed the point lady! Do not equalize President Rajapaksha with Praba the terrorist. Because as you know correctly Rajapaksha is the duely elected leader of the country and Praba is a illigal terrorist.Rajapaksa's job is to keep the country together for that he need patritism. There is nothing wrong with that!! if you do not like patritism go and find refuge in some other country mabe US. Oh! I am sorry they kill millions of muslims to keep their country safe on the name of American patritism. Only problem is there is no UN pannel to investigate them. Any way if you tell this type of stories to a american redneck by just changing the names; you will end up in jail. Thanks to Sri lankan democracy you still allowed to earn NGO dollers while criticing own country. Go to hell lady!! Shame on you!

Posted by: Deshpremiya | April 30, 2011 11:36 PM

Having recently come across the INGO Internal Crisis Group Sri Lanka Report 2007, and noted the number of times it refers to Transcurrents publications as a reference source to compile their human rights and war crimes allegations against Sri Lanka, there is hardly any doubt this article published by transcurrents will be quoted as a personal accusation compilation of credibility and referrel value to the "international jurists" of the LTTE-supporter disposition to charge Mahinda Rajapaksa and Gotabhaya Rajapaksa in person/s.

I am not abusing you and never do such even when the other party may even attempt to murder me. As such your rule of "generally approved/posted if they are not abusive of the topic as well as the author and/or another commenter" hopefully makes my last comment [and visit to your site] publishable.
Good luck to you and your contributors and sympathies to those whom you wish to publish for.
Good luck to you Mr. Jeyaraj and Good Bye

Posted by: Asitha | April 30, 2011 11:53 PM

Well said. keep writing.

Posted by: Mawala Hirantha | May 1, 2011 02:53 AM

This story is known for many years, western countries helped both sides and making money through private sector normal way its happening now days to earn extra money etc. But opinion about people of SL s reagrding last days of war Is simply this- There are many people died all thease years millions suffered and still suffering, 99% of them are poor people . question was did we suffer like that in the future or sacrifice few and live peacefully (even still we are poor) in the future.
This is something UN moon and obama cant understand and that british fellow millband still suffering from.

Posted by: Human | May 1, 2011 03:48 AM

Post a comment

(The comment may need to be approved by transcurrents.com. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting; generally approved/posted if they are not abusive of the topic as well as the author and/or another commenter.)

(Please write the comment in paragraphs if its long and allow space between paragraphs, for easier reading by others)

Recent Posts on TC